24 Feb 2018 - feedback (session) - CAS London conference 2018

Session feedback

Please use this form to give us your feedback on the four sessions you attended, thank you.

Question Title

* 1. Session One (AM1) - choose your topic

H1 – Primary: Using tangible programming to support SEN w Jody Carter

H2 – Primary: Smelly code & programming pedagogy with Jane Waite

H5 – Secondary: pedagogy with William Lau

H6 – Secondary: AQA exam board session with Chris

H7 – Primary: iPads, apps for classroom impact w Gillian Ingram

IT1 – Secondary: Python Introduction w John Feleppa

IT2 – Primary/Secondary: Minecraft (virtual worlds & programming) w Simon Johnson (CLC Cimon)

IT3 – Creative projects w micro:bit (python focus) w Drew Buddie

IT6 – Secondary: A level – Databases in Python with Hardip Mothada

IT7 – Secondary: A level - OOP w William Marsh

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Feedback on Session One

	Agree strongly	Agree	Disagree	Disagree strongly
I learned something I can apply	I learned something I can apply Agree strongly	I learned something I can apply Agree	I learned something I can apply Disagree	I learned something I can apply Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well prepared	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree strongly
Good range of appropriate activities	Good range of appropriate activities Agree strongly	Good range of appropriate activities Agree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree strongly
Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction'	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree strongly	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree strongly

Question Title

* 3. Session Two (AM2) - choose your topic

H1 – Primary: Google classrooms/G Suite w Darren Murphey & Wendy McLeod

H2 – Primary: KS2/3 – FastForward: Machine Learning & Big Data including digital identity w Paul Curzon & Jane Waite

IT1 – Secondary: Algorithm writing with pseudo code & flow charts w Trevor Bragg

IT2 – Secondary: Stride (a framebased editor to transition from blocks to text) with Neil Brown

IT3 – Primary: Physical computing pedagogy (inc spheros, microbits, bluebots, drones) w Nic Hughes

IT6 – Secondary: A level - Boolean Algebra & Karnaugh Maps w Eliot Williams

IT7 – Secondary: A level - Making hardware work (binary, Arduino) w Michael Jones

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. Feedback on Session Two

	Agree strongly	Agree	Disagree	Disagree strongly
I learned something I can apply	I learned something I can apply Agree strongly	I learned something I can apply Agree	I learned something I can apply Disagree	I learned something I can apply Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well prepared	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree strongly
Good range of appropriate activities	Good range of appropriate activities Agree strongly	Good range of appropriate activities Agree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree strongly
Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction'	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree strongly	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree strongly

Question Title

* 5. Session Three (PM1) - choose your topic

H1 – Primary: ScratchMaths (Y6 resources) with Pier Saunders (UCL)

H2 – Primary: Cubetto, KS1 & Early Years with Helen Cheung & Eleni Vasileiadou

H5 – NEA project assessing / standardisation with Garfield Gordon

H6 – Secondary: OCR exam board with Vinay Thawait

H7 – Drones, RAF 100, Engineering with the Movies with Royal Acad Eng: Scott Atkinson & Ivan Gutowski-Smith (KS3/2)

IT1 – Secondary: KS4 – Teaching data representation (manipulating images / sound in Python) with Alex Hadwen-Bennett

IT2 – Secondary: KS3/4 – PRIMM, Pedagogy for Programming w Sue

IT3 – Primary/Secondary: KS1 to KS4 - Networks with Duncan Maidens

IT6 – Secondary: A level – C# with Martin Richards

IT7 – Secondary: KS4/5 Data Analysis w Jupyter Notebooks – Michel Wermelinger and Clifford French

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. Feedback on Session Three

	Agree strongly	Agree	Disagree	Disagree strongly
I learned something I can apply	I learned something I can apply Agree strongly	I learned something I can apply Agree	I learned something I can apply Disagree	I learned something I can apply Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well prepared	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree strongly
Good range of appropriate activities	Good range of appropriate activities Agree strongly	Good range of appropriate activities Agree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree strongly
Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction'	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree strongly	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree strongly

Question Title

* 7. Session Four (PM2) - choose your topic

H1 – Primary: LGFL cross curricula with VR with Bradley Dardis

H2 – Primary: Assessment with Phil Bagge

H6 – Secondary: KS4 – Challenges of teaching GCSE & flipped classroom solutions w Craig n Dave

H7 – Primary / Secondary: KS3/4 - Embedding Computational Thinking w Rob Heathcote

Secondary assessment - Miles Berry

IT1 – Primary: Unplugged / Scratch w Jane Waite & Susan Mehmet

IT2 – Secondary: KS4/5 - Sorting & Searching Algorithms in Python w Demetrios Skamiotis

IT3 – Primary / Secondary: KS2/3/4 - Cybersecurity w Duncan Maidens

IT6 – Secondary: A level - Advanced Python (Web Dev Frameworks & Python) w Sue Sentance

IT7 – Secondary: A level - Big O notation w Python w Ramzi Ramzi

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 8. Feedback on Session Four

	Agree strongly	Agree	Disagree	Disagree strongly
I learned something I can apply	I learned something I can apply Agree strongly	I learned something I can apply Agree	I learned something I can apply Disagree	I learned something I can apply Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Agree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree	The trainer(s) were well-informed on their subject matter Disagree strongly
The trainer(s) were well prepared	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree strongly	The trainer(s) were well prepared Agree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree	The trainer(s) were well prepared Disagree strongly
Good range of appropriate activities	Good range of appropriate activities Agree strongly	Good range of appropriate activities Agree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree	Good range of appropriate activities Disagree strongly
Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction'	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree strongly	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Agree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree	Good balance between 'trainer's input' and 'participant involvement and interaction' Disagree strongly