CHEAD Conference 2016 Delegate Survey

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about the conference?

Invitation by CHEAD through your institutions membership

Suggestion by a colleague to attend

Via the CHEAD website

Other

Question Title

* 2. What did you expect to get from the conference, in relation to the particular demands of your role in HE?

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the conference.

Very Satisfied

Somewhat Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Somewhat Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Question Title

* 4. Please give your ratings 1-5 for the different sessions, with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory?

	Unsatisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Outstanding
Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England	Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England Unsatisfactory	Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England Poor	Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England Satisfactory	Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England Good	Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England Outstanding
Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller	Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller Unsatisfactory	Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller Poor	Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller Satisfactory	Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller Good	Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller Outstanding
Claire Doherty, Situations	Claire Doherty, Situations Unsatisfactory	Claire Doherty, Situations Poor	Claire Doherty, Situations Satisfactory	Claire Doherty, Situations Good	Claire Doherty, Situations Outstanding
Simon Morrissey, Foreground	Simon Morrissey, Foreground Unsatisfactory	Simon Morrissey, Foreground Poor	Simon Morrissey, Foreground Satisfactory	Simon Morrissey, Foreground Good	Simon Morrissey, Foreground Outstanding
Kate Brindley, Arnolfini	Kate Brindley, Arnolfini Unsatisfactory	Kate Brindley, Arnolfini Poor	Kate Brindley, Arnolfini Satisfactory	Kate Brindley, Arnolfini Good	Kate Brindley, Arnolfini Outstanding
Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath	Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath Unsatisfactory	Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath Poor	Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath Satisfactory	Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath Good	Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath Outstanding
Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum	Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum Unsatisfactory	Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum Poor	Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum Satisfactory	Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum Good	Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum Outstanding
Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst	Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst Unsatisfactory	Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst Poor	Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst Satisfactory	Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst Good	Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst Outstanding
Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University	Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University Unsatisfactory	Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University Poor	Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University Satisfactory	Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University Good	Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University Outstanding
Michael Marra, Design in Action	Michael Marra, Design in Action Unsatisfactory	Michael Marra, Design in Action Poor	Michael Marra, Design in Action Satisfactory	Michael Marra, Design in Action Good	Michael Marra, Design in Action Outstanding
Jo Nolan, Screen South	Jo Nolan, Screen South Unsatisfactory	Jo Nolan, Screen South Poor	Jo Nolan, Screen South Satisfactory	Jo Nolan, Screen South Good	Jo Nolan, Screen South Outstanding
Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design	Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design Unsatisfactory	Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design Poor	Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design Satisfactory	Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design Good	Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design Outstanding
Sir John Sorrell CBE	Sir John Sorrell CBE Unsatisfactory	Sir John Sorrell CBE Poor	Sir John Sorrell CBE Satisfactory	Sir John Sorrell CBE Good	Sir John Sorrell CBE Outstanding
Professor Neil Mulholland	Professor Neil Mulholland Unsatisfactory	Professor Neil Mulholland Poor	Professor Neil Mulholland Satisfactory	Professor Neil Mulholland Good	Professor Neil Mulholland Outstanding
Dr George Windsor, NESTA	Dr George Windsor, NESTA Unsatisfactory	Dr George Windsor, NESTA Poor	Dr George Windsor, NESTA Satisfactory	Dr George Windsor, NESTA Good	Dr George Windsor, NESTA Outstanding
Professor Gavin Turk	Professor Gavin Turk Unsatisfactory	Professor Gavin Turk Poor	Professor Gavin Turk Satisfactory	Professor Gavin Turk Good	Professor Gavin Turk Outstanding
S Mark Gubb	S Mark Gubb Unsatisfactory	S Mark Gubb Poor	S Mark Gubb Satisfactory	S Mark Gubb Good	S Mark Gubb Outstanding
Dr Simeon Nelson	Dr Simeon Nelson Unsatisfactory	Dr Simeon Nelson Poor	Dr Simeon Nelson Satisfactory	Dr Simeon Nelson Good	Dr Simeon Nelson Outstanding
Rabab Ghazoul	Rabab Ghazoul Unsatisfactory	Rabab Ghazoul Poor	Rabab Ghazoul Satisfactory	Rabab Ghazoul Good	Rabab Ghazoul Outstanding

Question Title

* 5. What was most valuable about the conference?

The presentations

The workshops

The Friday afternoon visits

Networking

Time away from your institute to absorb and reflect

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. What was least valuable about the conference?

The presentations

The workshops

The Friday afternoon visits

Networking

Time away from your institute to absorb and reflect

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 7. Did you think the structure of each day at the conference was:

Well paced

Just right

Too dense

Question Title

* 8. Did you think the time for networking was:

Too much

Just enough

Too little

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the following items? Please use the scala of 1-5 with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory.

	Unsatisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Outstanding
Relevance of conference contents	Relevance of conference contents Unsatisfactory	Relevance of conference contents Poor	Relevance of conference contents Satisfactory	Relevance of conference contents Good	Relevance of conference contents Outstanding
Quality of presentations	Quality of presentations Unsatisfactory	Quality of presentations Poor	Quality of presentations Satisfactory	Quality of presentations Good	Quality of presentations Outstanding
Information available online	Information available online Unsatisfactory	Information available online Poor	Information available online Satisfactory	Information available online Good	Information available online Outstanding
Registration process	Registration process Unsatisfactory	Registration process Poor	Registration process Satisfactory	Registration process Good	Registration process Outstanding
Conference venues/facilities	Conference venues/facilities Unsatisfactory	Conference venues/facilities Poor	Conference venues/facilities Satisfactory	Conference venues/facilities Good	Conference venues/facilities Outstanding
Organisational arrangements for and during the event	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Unsatisfactory	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Poor	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Satisfactory	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Good	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Outstanding
Dates of the conference	Dates of the conference Unsatisfactory	Dates of the conference Poor	Dates of the conference Satisfactory	Dates of the conference Good	Dates of the conference Outstanding
Social and networking events	Social and networking events Unsatisfactory	Social and networking events Poor	Social and networking events Satisfactory	Social and networking events Good	Social and networking events Outstanding

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about the conference?

Question Title

* 2. What did you expect to get from the conference, in relation to the particular demands of your role in HE?

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the conference.

Question Title

* 4. Please give your ratings 1-5 for the different sessions, with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory?

Question Title

* 5. What was most valuable about the conference?

Question Title

* 6. What was least valuable about the conference?

Question Title

* 7. Did you think the structure of each day at the conference was:

Question Title

* 8. Did you think the time for networking was:

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the following items? Please use the scala of 1-5 with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory.

Question Title

* 10. Is there anything else you would like to share with us?