Based on initial feedback from the Global Pound Conference, a Mixed Modes Task Force (the “Taskforce") was set up by the College of Commercial Arbitrators (CCA), the International Mediation Institute (IMI) and the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine School of Law to examine possible new ways of combining mediation with arbitration. (More information.)

One of the six working groups in this Taskforce is looking into interactions between mediators and arbitrators.  The Taskforce is looking at all combined processes (such as med/arb) that run sequentially, in parallel or are integrated into one-another, and how and under what constraints the neutrals may communicate with one-another. This is an area that obviously raises many concerns, as the point is not to jeopardize any arbitration or other proceedings, but to explore what may be possible or advisable.  In order to help this working group with its task, we are seeking any information and/or feedback to the following questions:

Question Title

* 1. What cases have you encountered where adjudicative neutrals (judges or arbitrators) interacted with non-adjudicative neutrals (e.g. mediators or conciliators)?

Question Title

* 2. What issues, if any, were faced by the neutrals/advocates in working together?

Question Title

* 3. What were the case outcomes?

Question Title

* 4. Email follow-up

  Yes
I am willing to discuss my experiences with a Task Force member
I would like to receive follow-up information concerning the results of this survey
Thank you for your time, and for your support of IMI.

T