ICS Live event: The Patients Dilemma: Fears for COVID-19 for Neurogenic Bladder Complications CME

How to claim CME credit

In order to receive your certificate of participation and CME credit, you need to complete the below evaluation form and enter your email address at the end of the survey. A certificate will be emailed to you in due course.

The "COVID-19" - The Patients Dilemma: Fears for COVID-19 for Neurogenic Bladder Complications, Bristol (live streaming), United Kingdom, 16/07/2020-16/07/2020 has been accredited by the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME®) with 1 European CME credits (ECMEC®s). Each medical specialist should claim only those hours of credit that he/she actually spent in the educational activity.

Through an agreement between the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes and the American Medical Association, physicians may convert EACCME® credits to an equivalent number of AMA PRA Category 1 Credits (TM.) Information on the process to convert EACCME® credit to AMA credit can be found at www.ama-assn.org/education/earn-credit-participation-international-activities.

Live educational activities, occurring outside of Canada, recognised by the UEMS-EACCME® for ECMEC®s are deemed to be Accredited Group Learning Activities (Section 1) as defined by the Maintenance of Certification Program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

Question Title

* 1. Name (to appear on your certificate)

Question Title

* 2. How did you hear about the course?

ICS website

Social Media

Colleague

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. Please rate the event and its aims:

	1 = poor	2 = slightly inadequate	3 = adequate	4 = good	5 = extremely good
The aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved	The aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 1 = poor	The aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 2 = slightly inadequate	The aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 3 = adequate	The aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 4 = good	The aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 5 = extremely good
The defined aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved	The defined aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 1 = poor	The defined aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 2 = slightly inadequate	The defined aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 3 = adequate	The defined aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 4 = good	The defined aims / learning objectives of the event were achieved 5 = extremely good
The event was well organised	The event was well organised 1 = poor	The event was well organised 2 = slightly inadequate	The event was well organised 3 = adequate	The event was well organised 4 = good	The event was well organised 5 = extremely good
The event fulfilled my educational requirements	The event fulfilled my educational requirements 1 = poor	The event fulfilled my educational requirements 2 = slightly inadequate	The event fulfilled my educational requirements 3 = adequate	The event fulfilled my educational requirements 4 = good	The event fulfilled my educational requirements 5 = extremely good
Attending the event has helped me keep up to date in my practice	Attending the event has helped me keep up to date in my practice 1 = poor	Attending the event has helped me keep up to date in my practice 2 = slightly inadequate	Attending the event has helped me keep up to date in my practice 3 = adequate	Attending the event has helped me keep up to date in my practice 4 = good	Attending the event has helped me keep up to date in my practice 5 = extremely good
Attending the event has helped me maintain and improve the standard of care for my patients	Attending the event has helped me maintain and improve the standard of care for my patients 1 = poor	Attending the event has helped me maintain and improve the standard of care for my patients 2 = slightly inadequate	Attending the event has helped me maintain and improve the standard of care for my patients 3 = adequate	Attending the event has helped me maintain and improve the standard of care for my patients 4 = good	Attending the event has helped me maintain and improve the standard of care for my patients 5 = extremely good

Question Title

* 4. Please rate each participating speaker listed on the programme:

	1 = poor	2 = slightly inadequate	3 = adequate	4 = good	5 = extremely good
Giulio Del Popolo: Content of lecture	Giulio Del Popolo: Content of lecture 1 = poor	Giulio Del Popolo: Content of lecture 2 = slightly inadequate	Giulio Del Popolo: Content of lecture 3 = adequate	Giulio Del Popolo: Content of lecture 4 = good	Giulio Del Popolo: Content of lecture 5 = extremely good
Giulio Del Popolo: Lecturing ability	Giulio Del Popolo: Lecturing ability 1 = poor	Giulio Del Popolo: Lecturing ability 2 = slightly inadequate	Giulio Del Popolo: Lecturing ability 3 = adequate	Giulio Del Popolo: Lecturing ability 4 = good	Giulio Del Popolo: Lecturing ability 5 = extremely good
Stefania Musco: Content of lecture	Stefania Musco: Content of lecture 1 = poor	Stefania Musco: Content of lecture 2 = slightly inadequate	Stefania Musco: Content of lecture 3 = adequate	Stefania Musco: Content of lecture 4 = good	Stefania Musco: Content of lecture 5 = extremely good
Stefania Musco: Lecturing ability	Stefania Musco: Lecturing ability 1 = poor	Stefania Musco: Lecturing ability 2 = slightly inadequate	Stefania Musco: Lecturing ability 3 = adequate	Stefania Musco: Lecturing ability 4 = good	Stefania Musco: Lecturing ability 5 = extremely good
Pierre Denys: Content of lecture	Pierre Denys: Content of lecture 1 = poor	Pierre Denys: Content of lecture 2 = slightly inadequate	Pierre Denys: Content of lecture 3 = adequate	Pierre Denys: Content of lecture 4 = good	Pierre Denys: Content of lecture 5 = extremely good
Pierre Denys: Lecturing ability	Pierre Denys: Lecturing ability 1 = poor	Pierre Denys: Lecturing ability 2 = slightly inadequate	Pierre Denys: Lecturing ability 3 = adequate	Pierre Denys: Lecturing ability 4 = good	Pierre Denys: Lecturing ability 5 = extremely good
Michele Spinelli: Content of lecture	Michele Spinelli: Content of lecture 1 = poor	Michele Spinelli: Content of lecture 2 = slightly inadequate	Michele Spinelli: Content of lecture 3 = adequate	Michele Spinelli: Content of lecture 4 = good	Michele Spinelli: Content of lecture 5 = extremely good
Michele Spinelli: Lecturing ability	Michele Spinelli: Lecturing ability 1 = poor	Michele Spinelli: Lecturing ability 2 = slightly inadequate	Michele Spinelli: Lecturing ability 3 = adequate	Michele Spinelli: Lecturing ability 4 = good	Michele Spinelli: Lecturing ability 5 = extremely good
Gianluca Sampogna: Content of lecture	Gianluca Sampogna: Content of lecture 1 = poor	Gianluca Sampogna: Content of lecture 2 = slightly inadequate	Gianluca Sampogna: Content of lecture 3 = adequate	Gianluca Sampogna: Content of lecture 4 = good	Gianluca Sampogna: Content of lecture 5 = extremely good
Gianluca Sampogna: Lecturing ability	Gianluca Sampogna: Lecturing ability 1 = poor	Gianluca Sampogna: Lecturing ability 2 = slightly inadequate	Gianluca Sampogna: Lecturing ability 3 = adequate	Gianluca Sampogna: Lecturing ability 4 = good	Gianluca Sampogna: Lecturing ability 5 = extremely good

Question Title

* 5. Any other comments on any of the faculty?

Question Title

* 6. Do you think the event avoided undue commercial bias?

Yes

Question Title

* 7. If no, please specify

Question Title

* 8. Would you recommend the course to a colleague?

Yes

Question Title

* 9. If No, please explain your reasons

Question Title

* 10. Should we conduct a similar course in the future?

Yes

Question Title

* 11. What was the strongest aspect of this event?

Question Title

* 12. What was the weakest aspect of this event?

Question Title

* 13. What if anything, should have been included in the programme that was not?

Question Title

* 14. Do you have any suggestions for improving the next event?

Question Title

* 15. Please provide your email address if you would like to receive a CME certificate

Many thanks for completing the evaluation. Should you have any questions or require any further assistance, please contact the ICS office by email: info@ics.org