* 1. Do you think the current FSCS funding review will go far enough?

* 2. Do you agree with the FCA’s decision to rule out a product levy as a funding model for the FSCS?

* 3. Does there need to be more transparency over how the FSCS arrives at its levy figures?

* 4. Do you believe that the current system unfairly penalises responsible firms for the malpractice of others?

* 5. FCA chairman John Griffith-Jones has commented in the press that a "polluter pays" approach could work as an alternative funding model, which would also include a "no-claims bonus" for adviser firms who have never had to make a claim. Do you think this alternative approach is plausible and fair?

* 6. Can you suggest an alternative to the current FSCS system?

* 7. Could the increasing levies imposed by the FSCS see your firm being unable to pay?

* 8. Are you male or female?

* 9. Which category below includes your age?

* 10. How long have you been in the industry?

* 11. Are you a member of a Network? If so, which one:

* 12. Would you be interested in joining a research panel set up by Panacea if you could earn a small income for your time?

Report a problem