Thank you for considering becoming a Reviewer for EAWOP. Your reviews will be anonymous, and you will be provided with clear guidelines for reviewing that cover the different kinds of submission. Question Title * 1. Please complete the contact details below Title First name * Other initial Family name * Email Address * Affiliation * Question Title * 2. Are you a Practioner Academic Both Question Title * 3. Please describe why you think you are competent to act as a reviewer (e.g., previous reviewing experience, subject knowledge). 150 words max Question Title * 4. Please select your topics of expertise (maximum of 6 topics) 1. Aging workforce and retirement 2. Attitudes at work (job satisfaction, organizational commitment and identification) 3. Bullying and counter productive work behaviours 4. Careers (planning and management; patterns and mobility; occupational choice and career guidance) 5. Coping and social support 6. Creativity and innovation 7. Diversity in the workplace (managing diversity; multi-cultural organizations) 8. Emerging themes in WOP 9. Emotions in the workplace (management of emotion; emotional labour) 10. Entrepreneurship 11. Ethics and sustainability 12. Group and team processes 13. Interventions in the workplace 14. Job insecurity and temporary/contingent work 15. Job crafting and proactive behaviour 16. Leadership and leader development 17. Organizational structure, culture, climate and management of change 18. Performance and organizational citizenship behaviour 19. Personality and individual differences 20. Recovery and unwinding 21. Research Design, methods, statistics 22. Safety management (human error and accident, safety climate and culture) 23. Selection, assessment and psychometrics 24. Technology, work-design and human-machine-systems 25. Training and coaching 26. Unemployment and labour market entry 27. Well-being, engagement, stress and burnout 28. Work motivation 29. Work organisation and job design 30. Work-life balance Question Title * 5. How many submissions would you be willing to review? [A submission consists of a 500-750 word abstract and a typical review takes 15-30 minutes] 10 11-15 16-20 Question Title * 6. Reviewers responsibilities Reviewers need to be aware that conflicts of interest must be avoided, and should they arise in the reviewing process, the Programme Committee Chair should be immediately informed. I agree to the reviewer responsibilities Question Title * 7. The information submitted on this form will be shared with the EAWOP 2022 organising committee, the BPS and Redactive Events in order to process your application for review. I agree I disagree Submit
