Screen Reader Mode Icon

Question Title

* 1. What are your thoughts about the language used to describe FGM? How does this fit in with social work values and principles? (Always be aware of the impact you have on a service user- the language used can disempower and alienate-works against protection and often leads to disengagement. AVOID stigmatising Language. Words such as “ in-humane, monstrous, barbaric, senseless, cruel, primitive, horrific, mangle, speechless, disgusted, painful, degrading, terrifying, sickening, devastating, heinous” may attempt to describe the negative impacts of FGM but they can lead to a communication breakdown. An FGM survivor may receive this language as oppressive which may make it difficult to work with parents whose children are likely to be at risk. Consider anti-oppressive and anti-discriminatory practice. Consider also how assessments can be conducted in an empowering manner so as to bring about social change-collaborative working with parents and affected communities.)

Question Title

* 2. How do you feel about classing FGM as Gender Based Violence? How might you work with a survivor who does not share the same views as you on this issue?

Question Title

* 3. What three theories/ approaches could a social worker employ when working with girls at risk of FGM and their parents? May include:

-Anti-Racist Social Work

-Anti-Discriminatory Practice

-Empowerment Model

-Anti-Oppressive Practice

-Child-centred approach

-Cultural Competence

-Systems Theory/Approach-Trauma informed Practice

Question Title

* 4. What ethical dilemmas might you face when assessing risk of a child having FGM performed on her? Examples include:

- Concerned of being labelled racist or stereotyping

- Practice far removed from one’s own reality

- Unsure what question to ask during visit

Question Title

* 5. Please provide your details so that we can confirm that you have completed this topic.

0 of 5 answered
 

T