MMPAD Case Study Series - Case 3: Hypoglycaemia and Technology We value your feedback. Please complete the short evaluation survey below: Question Title * 1. How well did the patient case study fulfil the following learning objectives?Upon completion of this education activity, I am better able to: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Describe how to recognise problematic hypoglycaemia Describe how to recognise problematic hypoglycaemia Strongly Agree Describe how to recognise problematic hypoglycaemia Agree Describe how to recognise problematic hypoglycaemia Neutral Describe how to recognise problematic hypoglycaemia Disagree Describe how to recognise problematic hypoglycaemia Strongly Disagree Debate the appropriate introduction of different technologies for a patient with problematic hypoglycaemia Debate the appropriate introduction of different technologies for a patient with problematic hypoglycaemia Strongly Agree Debate the appropriate introduction of different technologies for a patient with problematic hypoglycaemia Agree Debate the appropriate introduction of different technologies for a patient with problematic hypoglycaemia Neutral Debate the appropriate introduction of different technologies for a patient with problematic hypoglycaemia Disagree Debate the appropriate introduction of different technologies for a patient with problematic hypoglycaemia Strongly Disagree Explain how to monitor a patient using technology to ensure a reduction in hypoglycaemia Explain how to monitor a patient using technology to ensure a reduction in hypoglycaemia Strongly Agree Explain how to monitor a patient using technology to ensure a reduction in hypoglycaemia Agree Explain how to monitor a patient using technology to ensure a reduction in hypoglycaemia Neutral Explain how to monitor a patient using technology to ensure a reduction in hypoglycaemia Disagree Explain how to monitor a patient using technology to ensure a reduction in hypoglycaemia Strongly Disagree Question Title * 2. How would you rate the overall quality of the case study activity? 1 = Poor, 10 = Excellent 1 10 Clear i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale. Question Title * 3. Please comment on the content of the case studyThis activity: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Was based on relevant and current evidence Was based on relevant and current evidence Strongly Agree Was based on relevant and current evidence Agree Was based on relevant and current evidence Neutral Was based on relevant and current evidence Disagree Was based on relevant and current evidence Strongly Disagree Increased my knowledge of the subjects Increased my knowledge of the subjects Strongly Agree Increased my knowledge of the subjects Agree Increased my knowledge of the subjects Neutral Increased my knowledge of the subjects Disagree Increased my knowledge of the subjects Strongly Disagree Focused on competencies relevant to my practice Focused on competencies relevant to my practice Strongly Agree Focused on competencies relevant to my practice Agree Focused on competencies relevant to my practice Neutral Focused on competencies relevant to my practice Disagree Focused on competencies relevant to my practice Strongly Disagree Will help me improve patient care within my clinical practice Will help me improve patient care within my clinical practice Strongly Agree Will help me improve patient care within my clinical practice Agree Will help me improve patient care within my clinical practice Neutral Will help me improve patient care within my clinical practice Disagree Will help me improve patient care within my clinical practice Strongly Disagree Question Title * 4. As a result of participating in this patient case study, will you make any measurable changes in your role? Yes Possibly, after additional training/information No, but the content affirms my current daily practice No, I am unable to implement the information Please give details: Question Title * 5. Did you feel there was any bias (commercial or personal) evident within the educational content? No Yes: Commercial (you felt there was undue prominence given to a specific product) Yes: Professional (you felt there was inappropriate influence of a related organisation) Yes: Personal (the personal interests of the author caused bias) Yes: other If you feel there was commercial or any other bias, please explain, ideally by citing specific content where bias was present: Question Title * 6. Would you recommend this activity to a colleague? Yes No Question Title * 7. Do you have any questions or final comments?Please provide your email address if you would like a response Done