Skip to content
Current± Readership Survey 2020
1.
Name
2.
Company
3.
Which part of the energy sector do you work in?
Generation
Networks
Energy Storage
Emobility
Energy monitoring/trading
Heat
Other (please specify)
4.
How frequently do you read Current±?
At least once a day
Two or three times a week
Once a week
Less than once a week
5.
How frequently do you open the Current± newsletter?
Every day
A few times a week
About once a week
Less than once a week
Do not receive the Current± newsletter (to subscribe,
click here
)
6.
Which of Current±’s content areas do you read more frequently?
Technology
Regulation
Emobility
Networks
Supply
7.
From 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) please rank Current±’s coverage of the following areas
1 (Poor)
3 (Ok)
5 (Excellent)
Technology
1 (Poor)
3 (Ok)
5 (Excellent)
Regulation
1 (Poor)
3 (Ok)
5 (Excellent)
Emobility
1 (Poor)
3 (Ok)
5 (Excellent)
Networks
1 (Poor)
3 (Ok)
5 (Excellent)
Supply
1 (Poor)
3 (Ok)
5 (Excellent)
8.
Why do you read Current±?
9.
How would you describe Current±’s coverage in general?
10.
If you were to recommend or describe Current± to a colleague or associate, how would you do so?
11.
How could Current± cater for your needs/wants more effectively?
Better content
More regular engagement
Different types of content
More interactive opportunities (Webinars, Q&As, Network opportunities etc)
More in-depth features
Other (please specify)
12.
If there is any other feedback or issues you would like to raise regarding Current±, its coverage to date or its plans for 2021 and beyond, then please do use the box below.
Current Progress,
0 of 12 answered