Croydon’s Labour-run Council has recently published its proposals for consultation on the next version of the “Local Plan” which sets planning policy for our Borough, including housing targets. It is an important document. They propose three options. These include building 5,000 homes on the green belt, turning Purley into a version of Croydon town centre, building more homes than required even by Sadiq Khan’s London Plan and continuing to destroy family homes and replace them with blocs of flats. These are all terrible ideas in my view, but I want to hear your thoughts.

I've written up their policies and what I think of them. Let me know if you agree or disagree with me on:

Question Title

* 1. Option 3 suggests building around 5,000 homes on the green belt, including next to Mitchley Hill and Rectory Park in Sanderstead. Our green spaces are precious and are what make our neighbourhood special.

The Labour council should not be thinking about building on the precious green belt

Question Title

* 2. All options set a total Croydon house building target 2019-2039 of 46,000 houses. This is approaching 20% higher than the amount required even by Sadiq Khan’s London Plan (which is approx. 2,000 per year).

The council should not be setting targets that are higher than required

Question Title

* 3. All options propose 12,400-14,000 new homes in Croydon town centre over 20 years. Building high in Croydon town centre is reasonable and there are many existing sites with unattractive 1960s/70s buildings to redevelop into nicer buildings.

This target is not ambitious enough and should be higher. This will take the pressure off greener areas

Question Title

* 4. The options suggest that Purley should have 5,500 to 9,000 new homes.

It is ridiculous that Purley should be loaded with nearly as many new homes as central Croydon. This is totally wrong and would destroy Purley as we know it

Question Title

* 5. The one sensible idea in there is to transform the Purley Way industrial area and build homes on underused industrial and brownfield land. They target 9,400 to 12,000 homes in option 2 and less in options 1 and 3.

Option 2 is the best of these, but the target should be even higher. This will take pressure off greener spaces and Purley town centre

Question Title

* 6. The plans all contemplate continuing to knock down family homes and replace them with flats.

Family housing is needed and flats should go in town centre and brownfield locations. Destroying family homes is totally wrong

Question Title

* 7. They should develop brownfield sites first (like the large one between South Croydon Rec and Brighton Road which still contains nothing but a gigantic pile of rubble) and not target the green belt, Purley or destroy family homes

Question Title

* 8. Please enter your name and postcode

Please can you copy this link and forward it to your friends and family:
www.surveymonkey.com/r/CroydonLocalPlan
Thank you for filling in this survey. By submitting your email address, you choose to opt-in to receive further updates from Chris Philp.

T