Question Title

* 1. Was the information provided helpful?

Question Title

* 2. Did you provide a response to the 8 turbine, 180m wind farm proposal in January 2020? 

Question Title

* 3. What were your views on the 8 turbine, 180m proposal previously put forward?

Question Title

* 4. From the information provided and in light of the changes to the proposed development do the changes improve your opinion of the proposed Bad Fearn Wind Farm?

Question Title

* 5. Based on your answer to Q3, would you be willing to support the revised proposal of 6 turbines at 150m? We would like to understand the reasons behind your answer - please leave any reasons you would like to share in the box

Question Title

* 6. From the information provided, do you agree we have met our aim of reduced visual impact via lowering tip height, deleting turbines, and removing the need for aviation lighting? 

Question Title

* 7. Do you agree that the proposed development would contribute towards Scottish renewable energy targets which are now more important than ever given the recently declared climate emergency by the Scottish Government? 

Question Title

* 8. Although it is not a direct reason for approval or refusal (i.e. it is not a material planning consideration), do you feel Dunbeath and area currently benefits from the community benefit funds associated with renewable energy (currently £5,000 per MW, per year)? 

Question Title

* 9. Although it is not a direct reason for approval or refusal (i.e. it is not a material planning consideration), do you feel Dunbeath and area would benefit in future from the community benefit funds associated with renewable energy (currently £5,000 per MW, per year)?

0 of 9 answered
 

T