EITC-2017-Friday Survey

Question Title

* 1. How likely is it that you would recommend this course to a friend?

0 - Not at all likely

100 - Extremely likely

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 2. Overall Friday (Day 5) Rating

Question Title

* 3. Spine

	Very Poor				Excellent
Biomechanics of spinal injury - Baker	Biomechanics of spinal injury - Baker Very Poor	Biomechanics of spinal injury - Baker	Biomechanics of spinal injury - Baker	Biomechanics of spinal injury - Baker	Biomechanics of spinal injury - Baker Excellent
Cervical fractures - Austin	Cervical fractures - Austin Very Poor	Cervical fractures - Austin	Cervical fractures - Austin	Cervical fractures - Austin	Cervical fractures - Austin Excellent
Thoracolumbar fractures - Baker	Thoracolumbar fractures - Baker Very Poor	Thoracolumbar fractures - Baker	Thoracolumbar fractures - Baker	Thoracolumbar fractures - Baker	Thoracolumbar fractures - Baker Excellent
Cases	Cases Very Poor	Cases	Cases	Cases	Cases Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Open Fractures & Limb Reconstruction

	Very Poor				Excellent
Principles of treatment	Principles of treatment Very Poor	Principles of treatment	Principles of treatment	Principles of treatment	Principles of treatment Excellent
Soft tissue coverage	Soft tissue coverage Very Poor	Soft tissue coverage	Soft tissue coverage	Soft tissue coverage	Soft tissue coverage Excellent
Treating missing bone	Treating missing bone Very Poor	Treating missing bone	Treating missing bone	Treating missing bone	Treating missing bone Excellent
Cases	Cases Very Poor	Cases	Cases	Cases	Cases Excellent

Question Title

* 5. Pelvis

	Very Poor				Excellent
Resuscitation and management in polytrauma - Bates	Resuscitation and management in polytrauma - Bates Very Poor	Resuscitation and management in polytrauma - Bates	Resuscitation and management in polytrauma - Bates	Resuscitation and management in polytrauma - Bates	Resuscitation and management in polytrauma - Bates Excellent
Pelvic and sacral fractures - Hull	Pelvic and sacral fractures - Hull Very Poor	Pelvic and sacral fractures - Hull	Pelvic and sacral fractures - Hull	Pelvic and sacral fractures - Hull	Pelvic and sacral fractures - Hull Excellent
Acetabular fractures	Acetabular fractures Very Poor	Acetabular fractures	Acetabular fractures	Acetabular fractures	Acetabular fractures Excellent
Cases	Cases Very Poor	Cases	Cases	Cases	Cases Excellent

Question Title

* 6. Passing the FRCS

	Very Poor				Excellent
Clinical examination	Clinical examination Very Poor	Clinical examination	Clinical examination	Clinical examination	Clinical examination Excellent
Viva examination - the trauma station	Viva examination - the trauma station Very Poor	Viva examination - the trauma station	Viva examination - the trauma station	Viva examination - the trauma station	Viva examination - the trauma station Excellent

Question Title

* 7. What were the best bits/highlights of Day 5?

Question Title

* 8. What could be improved about Day 5?

Question Title

* 9. Overall Course Rating

	Strongly disagree				Strongly agree
The objectives were clearly defined	The objectives were clearly defined Strongly disagree	The objectives were clearly defined	The objectives were clearly defined	The objectives were clearly defined	The objectives were clearly defined Strongly agree
Participation and interaction was encouraged	Participation and interaction was encouraged Strongly disagree	Participation and interaction was encouraged	Participation and interaction was encouraged	Participation and interaction was encouraged	Participation and interaction was encouraged Strongly agree
The topics covered were relevant	The topics covered were relevant Strongly disagree	The topics covered were relevant	The topics covered were relevant	The topics covered were relevant	The topics covered were relevant Strongly agree
The content was organised and easy to follow	The content was organised and easy to follow Strongly disagree	The content was organised and easy to follow	The content was organised and easy to follow	The content was organised and easy to follow	The content was organised and easy to follow Strongly agree
The materials provided were helpful	The materials provided were helpful Strongly disagree	The materials provided were helpful	The materials provided were helpful	The materials provided were helpful	The materials provided were helpful Strongly agree
The course will be useful in practice	The course will be useful in practice Strongly disagree	The course will be useful in practice	The course will be useful in practice	The course will be useful in practice	The course will be useful in practice Strongly agree
The faculty were knowledge about their topics	The faculty were knowledge about their topics Strongly disagree	The faculty were knowledge about their topics	The faculty were knowledge about their topics	The faculty were knowledge about their topics	The faculty were knowledge about their topics Strongly agree
The conference venue was well equipped	The conference venue was well equipped Strongly disagree	The conference venue was well equipped	The conference venue was well equipped	The conference venue was well equipped	The conference venue was well equipped Strongly agree
The catering (food and refreshments) were adequate	The catering (food and refreshments) were adequate Strongly disagree	The catering (food and refreshments) were adequate	The catering (food and refreshments) were adequate	The catering (food and refreshments) were adequate	The catering (food and refreshments) were adequate Strongly agree

Please use this space to expand on any of your answers

Question Title

* 10. What other subject areas would you like to have seen covered?

Question Title

* 11. Where did you hear about the Course?

Question Title

* 12. Do you have any final comments?

Thank you for completing this questionnaire and attending the Edinburgh International Trauma Course 2017