Has the Modern Slavery Act had an impact on your business?

Find out how you’re doing - compared to hundreds of other businesses - by taking part in our short (5 mins), online survey. Survey closes on 11 August 2016.

Historic Futures (String3) and Ergon Associates are combining their skills and insight to research what impact the Modern Slavery Act is having on businesses. We have created a short survey to assess the effect of the legislation on supply chain risk management processes. Taking part provides you with a unique opportunity to benchmark yourself anonymously against other businesses and receive our final report with aggregated findings.

·  10 questions long, takes only 5 minutes to complete
·  Add your email address if you wish to receive the final report
·  Benchmark yourself based on results
·  All data will be kept anonymous at all times
·  Report issued with results of survey

Historic Futures are certified to ISO27001, the information data security standard. We and Ergon Associates take the security of data very seriously at all times. No details of your name or organisation will be shared at any point.

Question Title

* 1. Where is your company headquartered?

Question Title

* 2. What is the annual turnover of your business?

Question Title

* 3. What sector does your organisation primarily operate in?

Question Title

* 4. What effect has the MSA had on engagement with risk, and supply chains, across the business?

  Less involved No change  More involved
Ethical trade team
Buyers
Technical team 
Directors
External consultants

Question Title

* 5. How has the business focus changed on the following activities since introduction of the MSA?

  Reduced focus No change Increased focus
Policy development and codes of conduct
Risk assessment and prioritisation
Risk monitoring, auditing and supply chain mapping 
Corrective and remedial action planning and follow-up

Question Title

* 6. How do you currently collect information about 'structure and complexity' of your supply chains?

  Once a year Every 6 months As needed Never
Sending questionnaires or spreadsheets to tier one suppliers
Using third party supplier management tools
Direct communication with suppliers beyond tier one

Question Title

* 7. Does the information you receive about your supply chains...

  Always Sometimes Rarely N/A
Include details of every organisation in the chain?
Provide details of operational and processes of tier one suppliers?
Deliver summary information about the supply chain, collected by tier one suppliers?

Question Title

* 8. Which stakeholders do you engage with when you:

  Colleagues within the company Suppliers NGOs or trade unions Affected workers Multi-stakeholder initiatives Other
Map your supply chain
Assess risk in your supply chain
Monitor or audit your suppliers
Take remedial action

Question Title

* 9. What actions are you able to take using the information you have about the structure and complexity of your supply chain?

  Always Sometimes Rarely N/A
Assess risk level for a selected product or product category
Seek additional information for specific risks
Monitor changes to risk level over time
Review effectiveness of mitigation strategies

Question Title

* 10. How confident are you in relation to the following:

  Very confident Confident Neutral Not confident
We know where our main risks of modern slavery might be in our supply chain or direct business
We have effectively prioritised the actions we need to take
The actions we take are / will be effective
We have identified appropriate collaborative partners
Our audit or monitoring programme delivers relevant and meaningful information

Question Title

* 11. If you would like to receive our report so that you can benchmark yourself against other companies, please add your email address here (all data collected will be kept strictly confidential)

Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions. If you have provided your email address above, we will send you the results in a report once the survey closes on 11 August 2016 and the results have been analysed.

T