Screen Reader Mode Icon
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. It should take approximately 15 minutes to complete.

This survey is intended to collect your views to guide the development of a toolkit to support planning and management of cocoa landscapes for multiple ecosystem services.

At the UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), we are committed to being transparent about the use of your personal data. Your data will be stored securely and will not be shared with or sold to third parties. Please read our policy on this on our website to learn more. Should you choose to provide your name and contact details, these will only be used to contact you about the information that you have submitted. Your data will be stored in the project contacts database until the completion of the project in June 2021.

By taking this survey, you acknowledge that your participation is voluntary, and you have the right to withdraw at any time.

As part of the CocoaSoils (https://cocoasoils.org/) project, led by Wageningen University, IITA and IDH, we (UNEP-WCMC) are developing a toolkit to help plan for multiple ecosystem services in cocoa landscapes. The toolkit will support planning at the landscape scale of interventions that seek to improve the productivity and sustainability of cocoa farming, such as through sustainable intensification, agroforestry, climate resilience and adaptation measures, and/or zero deforestation.

The toolkit will be built around a step-by-step workflow, which is described here. The toolkit will support planning for ecosystem services (or “multiple benefits”) from agricultural landscapes, with a focus on cocoa landscapes. It will guide users in making choices among existing tools that can be applied in each of the steps. The toolkit aims to go beyond guidance on tools for assessing the status of ecosystem services, to help users plan to improve the supply of desired ecosystem services.

The toolkit will allow users to select tools for the appropriate spatial scale (e.g. a watershed or farm) and resources available, e.g. using computer-based modelling at larger scales or participatory on-the-ground processes. It will include a range of tools for different audiences.

We are the stage of designing the toolkit and workflow, and we seek your expert advice on its usefulness and possible improvements. If you would be able to assist us in making the toolkit meet your needs, we would be very grateful if you could please complete this 15 minutes survey by 20 December 10 January 2020. Please feel free to distribute more widely to relevant contacts.

If you have any questions about this survey, or you would like more information on this project please contact Abigail.burns@unep-wcmc.org.

Question Title

* 1. I would like my contribution to be anonymised in any outputs resulting from this survey:

Question Title

* 2. Under these conditions, I agree to take part in this survey:

Question Title

* 3. Your organisation

Question Title

* 4. Which group of stakeholders do you represent? (tick all that apply)

Question Title

* 5. What are the main challenges preventing the sustainable management of cocoa landscapes in West Africa? (rank all that apply)

Question Title

* 6. Please specify any 'other' challenges preventing the sustainable management of cocoa landscapes in West Africa.

Question Title

* 7. Do you think a toolkit bringing together tools to support management for multiple benefits could be useful for improving sustainable management of cocoa landscapes in West Africa? Please provide comments and explanations (beyond yes/no!)

Question Title

* 8. Which group of stakeholders do you think most need this type of toolkit? (rank all that apply)

Question Title

* 9. Are you aware of any existing tools/toolkits etc. that would be useful to include in this toolkit, or that we should align with?

Question Title

* 10. Should we structure the toolkit by the level of technical capacity required to use individual tools? Please provide comments and explanations (beyond yes/no!).

Question Title

* 11. Should we structure the toolkit by step-by-step stages of the management process? Please provide comments and explanations (beyond yes/no!).

Question Title

* 12. Do you think the language used in the description of the toolkit (see survey intro) is appropriate for intended users?

Language used too basic Appropriate language used Language used too technical
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 13. Do you have any other suggestions/ideas that you feel could improve the concept of this toolkit?

Question Title

* 14. I would like to be contacted to follow up on my responses to this survey:

Question Title

* 15. Contact information:

Question Title

* 16. If you would be interested in reviewing a draft of the toolkit, please tick here (make sure to leave your name and email above if so!)

0 of 16 answered
 

T